<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: before I forget</title>
	<link>http://mtl3p.ilesansfil.org/blog/archives/2005/05/25/before_i_forget.html</link>
	<description>society, technology and me</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://mtl3p.ilesansfil.org/blog/archives/2005/05/25/before_i_forget.html#comment-658</link>
		<author>sarah</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 16:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mtl3p.ilesansfil.org/blog/archives/2005/05/25/before_i_forget.html#comment-658</guid>
					<description>1) yay for iTunes chatting!  geeks will always find a way.  yay for judging people based on musical preference too.

2) it's surreal here in Banff, isn't it?  I love it.  I feel all antsy when I'm sleeping and my laptop is off cause I can't check my email.  weird.

3) Sara Diamond's infamous parties...  You are one of the special people that can say they have attended.

4) so you say the personal blogging is "different" but you make no actual judgement.  What did you think of this mysterious "someone's" old blog?  It's not recognizable as blogging to you, but do you think it's helpful, entertaining, lacking substance, wasteful, annoying?  This is what I'm interested in.

5) No banff?  I'm out then. :)

see ya!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) yay for iTunes chatting!  geeks will always find a way.  yay for judging people based on musical preference too.</p>
<p>2) it&#8217;s surreal here in Banff, isn&#8217;t it?  I love it.  I feel all antsy when I&#8217;m sleeping and my laptop is off cause I can&#8217;t check my email.  weird.</p>
<p>3) Sara Diamond&#8217;s infamous parties&#8230;  You are one of the special people that can say they have attended.</p>
<p>4) so you say the personal blogging is &#8220;different&#8221; but you make no actual judgement.  What did you think of this mysterious &#8220;someone&#8217;s&#8221; old blog?  It&#8217;s not recognizable as blogging to you, but do you think it&#8217;s helpful, entertaining, lacking substance, wasteful, annoying?  This is what I&#8217;m interested in.</p>
<p>5) No banff?  I&#8217;m out then. :)</p>
<p>see ya!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtl3p</title>
		<link>http://mtl3p.ilesansfil.org/blog/archives/2005/05/25/before_i_forget.html#comment-659</link>
		<author>mtl3p</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mtl3p.ilesansfil.org/blog/archives/2005/05/25/before_i_forget.html#comment-659</guid>
					<description>2) sleeping makes you antsy because you're offline?  I love it!

3) yes.  Yes I am.

4)first of all, the mysterious person should include the link (when posting) to her own blog since she has one.  I didn't think much of the older blog that you she had because it was so obviously directed to another group of people that it said very little to me.  I didn't think that it was bad, but it didn't interest me.

However, your current blog is much more interesting and accessible.  I thought there was something different about your current blog, but I couldn't put my finger on it until now.  Each post is an update since the last one.  It's very journal style in it's aspiration to be continuous (contiguous?).  You rarely post about one topic, one idea.  Many of your posts have a focus, but they also include "and this"'s.

That's not a criticism.  It's different, and can be refreshing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2) sleeping makes you antsy because you&#8217;re offline?  I love it!</p>
<p>3) yes.  Yes I am.</p>
<p>4)first of all, the mysterious person should include the link (when posting) to her own blog since she has one.  I didn&#8217;t think much of the older blog that you she had because it was so obviously directed to another group of people that it said very little to me.  I didn&#8217;t think that it was bad, but it didn&#8217;t interest me.</p>
<p>However, your current blog is much more interesting and accessible.  I thought there was something different about your current blog, but I couldn&#8217;t put my finger on it until now.  Each post is an update since the last one.  It&#8217;s very journal style in it&#8217;s aspiration to be continuous (contiguous?).  You rarely post about one topic, one idea.  Many of your posts have a focus, but they also include &#8220;and this&#8221;&#8217;s.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not a criticism.  It&#8217;s different, and can be refreshing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
